I duplicated that with the same midi/patch for every instance.
I tested with the Spitfire Chamber Strings Cello Performance Legato patch, with a ~16bar midi melody with just modulation data.
I always felt that Logic outperformed Cubase, but the tests had some very weird and surprising results. That is a rather huge difference! I have the same Mac Pro, and out of curiosity did some similar tests in Cubase vs Logic. If anyone has any input or similar findings, post them here! Or let's talk about this.
Saffire mixcontrol confusing as hell pro#
Even Logic Pro X performs insanely well in comparison on the same machine.Īlso note, there is overclocking headroom on the X99 build to warrant a few more instances possibly (CPU & RAM) since the CPU is on water. There is definitely some under the hood work Steinberg needs to do on the macOS side, because there are numerous forums reporting the same thing. the 5960X is better, but not by an insane amount. that is a HUGE difference in loss of performance on the MP side.Įven IF, I installed macOS on the X99 build, I highly doubt it would be the same as the Windows results.Įven then, the 1650v2 and the 5960X aren't that crazy off in performance anyways. * I COULD have loaded more, but my RAM was maxed out 100% on the X99 build If i went down to 32 samples, instances went down only slightly to 224. Nuendo felt extremely sluggish while playing too.Ģ58 tracks/instances of Kontakt! (same libraries/patches as the mac and yes after the 82 track mark, i added more patches) 128 samples! AT 2048 samples! Anything more, and it would just click, and no samples played. That was ALL I was able to squeeze out of the MP. Samples loaded from a Team Group T-Force Delta 1TB SATA SSDĨ2 tracks/instances of Kontakt 2048 samples (max buffer)
Samples loaded from a Sabrent Rocket 1TB NVMe via a Sonnet Echo TB3 enclosureģ2GB of 3200MHz DDR4 Corsair Dominator Platinum RAM BUT dumbed down to 2133MHz for a slightly better comparison)ĥ12GB NVMe Samsung 970 Pro boot drive in m.2 slot on mobo Vega 64 8GB GPU (via a TB3 Razer Core X eGPU enclosure) Here's the specs of each machine:ĥ12GB NVMe Samsung 970 PRO boot drive with adapter (to fit in Apple's proprietary slot) Also, I understand these machines aren't exactly similar in specs, but even if they were closer to spec, the difference I noticed wouldn't be made up I feel, on the macOS side. Now, this is by no means a formal test, more so a "let's see what happens" kind of test lol.
Saffire mixcontrol confusing as hell Pc#
So, I conducted a small test today on the performance of Nuendo 10.0.20 on my 2013 Mac pro (trashcan) in comparison to another PC I own that i use for work. I'm not shocked because most of us know the performance hit we take using Cubase or Nuendo on macOS but I AM shocked at the difference in performance loss/gain.
0 kommentar(er)
